Archive for the ‘9-11’ Category.

Aafia Siddiqui – Victim or Terrorist

Peace everyone. This blog covers all the things you don’t really know about Aafia Siddiqui, a Pakistani Neuro-Surgeon, and all the implications around her disappearance, iconic representation in Pakistan, re-emergence,  her terrorist act (in Ghazni, Afghanistan) and consequent trial, prosecution and sentencing (In Manhattan, US). Once the facts are on the table, will give an inference, by law and logic, between the lines.

As always, the message is more important than the messenger or the celebrity in focus. This article does not advocate blind love or hatred for Aafia, but it hints awareness towards what made today’s ‘Aafia’ a possibility, and what we should learn from the incident.

Stated Facts

I. Aafias background

Father: Muhammad Salay Siddiqui, a British-trained neurosurgeon (Neurosurgery in focus)-deceased, cause of death  Aafias divorce, heart attack aug 2002 (see chronology).

Mother: Ismet (Farooqi) Prominent religious, political figure. Ex. MP Pakistan.

Siblings: youngest of three. Elder brother architect in Sugarland, Texas. Sister Fauzia (middle) also Harvard trained neurologist (again, neurology), worked at Sinai hospital, Baltimore, taught at John Hopkins university before returning to Pakistan.

Summary – All amongst Pakistans elite, mostly ex-pats in the sense that they ALL spent more time ABROAD then they did in Pakistan. Common grounds include neurology, careers in UK/US, international exposure and politics.

II. Chronology

This is a brief summary of events in Aafias life. Notice the amounts of time spent abroad, missing, in Pakistan etc.

Born: Karachi, Pakistan.

age 3-8 : attended school in Zambia, Southern Africa (off-shored at an early age, despite being youngest of the family)

8-17 : primary and secondary schooling in Karachi, Pakistan (academics unknown)

18-19: Moved to her brother, Houston, Texas, 1990 on student via. Studied at Houston university, 3 semesters.

19-22: MIT-Massachusetts institute of technology – full scholarship, BS. in biology-  triple major in Biology, anthropology, archaeology – grad 1995. Carrol Wilson award for thesis on ‘Islamization in Pakistan and effect on women’ - 1992

Worked with MSA (Muslim students association) and did fundraisers there – said that MSA students came into contact with Abdullah Azzam there (one of Bin ladens ppl, allegedly). Aafia always religious practitioner and propagator of Islamic ideology, throughout student life and beyond.

1995 - telephonic marriage to anesthesiologist (again another medical practitioner) Dr. Amjad Mohammed Khan, now dubbed involved in a plot to ‘terrorize’ a ‘gas station’ in Maryland  (lol. Imagine, doctors wanting to blow up gas stations, they must be low on logic, even in terrorist capacity, its a stupid place to blow up, it serves no purpose.)

1995-98 Amjad comes over to live with Aafia in Lexington, Massachusetts- two children born, Muhammad Ahmed (1996) and Mariam Binte Muhammad (1998) (these children carry great importance as we get to the main investigation). Both these children are AMERICAN citizens.

98-2001 - Brandeis university- Cognitive Neurosciences – PHD. Name of research paper is ‘Separating the components of Imitation’. look it up and read it – it is the most important thing about Aafia, her research. No one ever talks about it. It relates to brain learning patterns, short-term, long term memory, and indirectly – information retention mind control.

The couple also moved to Boston during this time. Aafia started IIRT – Institute of Islamic Research and Teaching. Aafia presided, husband was treasurer. Also established Dawa resource center – giving free copies of Quran and Islamic reform guidance to prison inmates and rehab ppl. (Personally I consider all these actions cultural, not terrorist  – threats).

9/11/2001 - allegedly, under the alias of Fahrem or Feriel Shahin, this Islam propagating neurosurgeon from Boston, Massachusetts bought $19 million worth of blood diamonds in Monrovia, Liberia (still unproven in court), while being with her family at the same time in Boston. This was brought forward 3 years LATER, in 2004 by US intelligence.

after 9/11- Siddiqui insisted on leaving the U.S., saying that it was unsafe for them and their children to remain there.

2002 - In May 2002, the FBI questioned Siddiqui and her husband regarding their purchase over the internet of $10,000 worth of night vision equipment, body armor, and military manuals including The Anarchist’s Arsenal, Fugitive, Advanced Fugitive, and How to Make C-4.Khan (husband) claimed that these were for hunting and camping expeditions. Most importantly, the FBI believed them, n on on June 26, 2002, the couple and their children returned to Pakistan. Smell a rat yet?

August 2002 - Khan heads to Aafias parents and divorces Aafia (great timing). Her father died of a heart attack, august 15, 2002. Third child Suleman (children important) born September 2002. Divorce finalized October 21 2002.

December 25, 2002 - Aafia leaves for US – saying she needs a job – returns january 3rd 2002 (job in Christmas eve season?)

2003 - Aafia working at Agha khan University Hospital – writes to Brandeis for finding a job at the University, owing to lack of options for her academic background in KHI.

Feb 2003 – Aafia marries  Ammar Al Baluchi, nephew of Khalid Shaikh Muhammad (a major weakness in her case, cause of marriage doesn’t make sense) for no particular reason, apparently. Personally, i have serious doubts about this marriage taking place , if at all.

march 1 2003 - Khalid Sheikh Muhammad, the new  ‘chief planner’ of Al Qaeda attacks ( i thought it was bin laden, but anyways) reported a ‘series’ of Al Aaeda operatives while in FBI custody. he also named Dr. Aafia (courier of blood diamonds and a financial fixer for al-Qaida), or so the case material says.

march 25 2003 - FBI issues global ‘wanted for questioning’ alert (much like a most wanted list) for Aafia and her husband (number 1).

Afraid of the FBI apprehension, on March 30, 2003, Aafia, with her three children, called a cab to get to the airport to leave for Islamabad, to her uncle. But she never made it to the other side. FBI claims they never found her in KHI, and she was not in any custody 2003-2008.


Aafia and her children’s whereabouts during 2003-2008 brew as many stories as you can count. Pakistans JI (jaamaat e Islami) seems to know right from 2003 that she was in US custody, they’ve been campaigning against it since forever.

Ministries and the Islamabad Airport confirmed that a woman was detained April 1 2003 for FBI questioning, but these reports were later denied. US says Pakistan ISI had her, ISI say they didnt have her,  then US says she is still wanted, all the time people say US has her. The only person who can answer if she was handed over or not – is Musharraf. But he doesn’t like to talk about his mistakes.

One thing is for sure though – she left with her children, meaning she was looking for asylum, not perpetrating terrorism.  and its important to see that she left with all 3 children. She didn’t get to her uncle in ISB, which means wherever she went, it was NOT her own will that got her there, she was abducted mid-way. If this wasn’t the case, she would still be with her uncle n three children in ISB.

Act of terrorism

July 17, 2008- Ghazni, Afghanistan. Outside the governors compound, with two small bags at her side, a burqa, and ONE child (her eldest son).  A woman by the name of Saliha is arrested and she turns out to be our girl. She is carrying a number of documents written in Urdu and English describing the creation of explosives, chemical weapons, Ebola, dirty bombs, and radiological agents,numerous chemical substances in gel and liquid form that were sealed in bottles and glass jars and 2 kilos of sodium cyanide.

Three versions of the story

1. The American Dream- American authorities say that the following day, on July 18, two FBI agents, a U.S. Army warrant officer, a U.S. Army captain, and their U.S. military interpreters arrived in Ghazni to interview Siddiqui at the Afghan National Police facility where she was being held. the warrant officer put down his M4 on the ground. Aafia, sitting behind the curtain, but not secure, went fr the M4, shouted ‘Allah hu akbar’ and sent two shots directly towards the personnel, no one was killed, but two were injured. She was secured and taken into custody immediately, after a revolver shot to her upper shoulder disarmed her.

2. Aafias story- she related a different version of events, according to Pakistani senators who later visited her in jail. She denied touching a gun, shouting, or threatening anyone. She said she stood up to see who was on the other side of the curtain, and that after one of the startled soldiers shouted “She is loose”, she was shot. On regaining consciousness, she said someone said “We could lose our jobs”. Interestingly, no one asked her how she got to Ghazni in the first place.

3. The Afghani version(translated) – Some of the Afghan police offered a third version of the events, telling Reuters that U.S. troops had demanded that she be handed over, disarmed the Afghans when they refused, and then shot Siddiqui mistakenly thinking she was a suicide bomber.

result – Aafia taken into custody till present day, on record.

Children’s whereabouts and statements

1.Ahmed – the eldest

Afghan authorities handed the boy over to Pakistan in September 2008, and he now lives with his aunt in Karachi, who has prohibited him from talking to the press.

August 2010 Yvonne Ridley reported that she had acquired a three paragraph statement taken from Ahmed by a US officer before he was released from US custody – (interestingly – he never was in custody of the US on record, was he)

This is the only fragment of truth, among all the stories given, as it speaks of the death of the youngest child, from a 12 year old.

Ahmed described Aafia driving a vehicle taking the family from Karachi to Islamabad, when it was overtaken by several vehicles, and he and his mother were taken into custody. He described the bloody body of his baby brother being left on the side of the road. He said that he had been too afraid to ask his interrogators who they were, but that they included both Pakistanis and Americans(ISI+ CIA). He described beatings when he was in US custody. Eventually, he said, he was sent to a conventional childrens’ prison in Pakistan.”

The timestamp for this would be Aafias travel Karachi-> Islamabad,  march-apr 2003, the time when she ‘disappeared’.

2. Daughter- Mariam

In April 2010, Pakistan Interior Minister Rehman Malik said that a 12-year-old girl who was found outside a house in Karachi was identified by a DNA test as Siddiqui’s daughter Mariyam, and that she had been returned to her family. Once again, on where she had been all this time, and where she came from – NO COMMENTS.

3. Youngest – Suleman(son)

Nowhere to be found. And how so – He died a bloody death at the age of less than a year, on the street during Aafia’s Capture – mar-apr 2003 (refer to Muhammad Ahmeds statement).

Trial and sentencing

Ironically, for an ‘unproven’ offense that took place in the jurisdiction of Ghazni, Afghanistan, on July 17, 2008 - the trial was held at New York City, US on January 19, 2010, 1.6 years worth of detention, torture and harassment later (not counting the off-record 5 year detention before that).

Aafias trial is the biggest mockery of the law, as literally nothing was proved , and the sentence was declared ‘as ordered’ by pressure groups. As none of the terrorist activities against aafia have been proven with substantial direct evidence, she was only charged on assaulting US officials at ghazni (the M4 story - refer to act of terrorism section, the American dream). Despite the fact that they never got her prints on the M4 even, the jury still gave a guilty verdict, and Aafia has been sent to prison for another 86 (eighty six) years for ‘terrorizing armed military officials’ who shot her, with as much as her voice. No trial however will take place for the injustices committed against her, her family and the merciless ‘collateral’ death of her youngest in 2003 - despite the fact that NONE of the accusations against her have any proof whatsoever.

Aafia’s statements included boycott of the proceedings as she believed they were rigged. She also said post trial – that all Muslims should display self control and not resort to violence following this decision.

The untold elements (must read)

This is the part for which you have been reading. What I infer is not necessarily true – it is just the most logical inference I can make with the data I’ve collected. so, here goes.

1. Not a Terrorist – But a victim of Terrorism

Aafia is not a terrorist – she is just someone who believes in standing up for Islam, and fellow Muslims. she has never taken a life, and she has never influenced someone to do something against their will,and she will continue to be the way she is. She might have associated with people who might have, in turn become ‘terrorists’ or extremist Muslims, but that doesn’t make her a terrorist. Just because someone loves Islam, believes in the occupation of Afghanistan n Iraq to be unjustified, and wishes to help Muslim brethren by non violent methods, like protest, medical expertise or proper legal process, there is nothing ‘terror-istic’ about it. Last time I checked, self defense for a community in general is not terrorism, unjustified occupation is.

2. One of Many

She is one of the 1200 + people taken under suspicion needlessly by the FBI following 9/11. Her exposure in media is due to her being a Pakistani elite – if she was me n you, you wouldn’t even notice. Her trial, and refusal of acquittal is a way of saving face - both for Pakistani as well as American authorities. They know she didn’t do anything wrong, n that grabbing her was a false alarm in the first place – but saying ‘hey we all messed up, sry aafia’ is gonna be the biggest mockery of government and intelligence procedure, both for US and Pakistan. So a cause needs to be created through which she can be labelled red – and prosecuted with legal right after. Hence the staged act in Ghazni, 2008 – as it proves she was not in US custody 2003-2008- and it also proves she is Al Qaida – indirectly.

3. Why did Aafia do it?

Simple. One child killed in front of her eyes, 2 left. Notice the timestamps on Mariam’s appearance / disappearance, and compare them with the Ghazni event, n the trial. She was missing all this time – I infer that Mariam was used as bargain collateral. Aafia , while in custody- was  ‘forced’ to stage the ghazni act, in exchange for her daughter’s acquittal - as soon as her trial began and the deal for her boycott/not winning the case was finalized, her daughter was released back to Pakistan. Her son was kept with her on-site to make it look more real and deliberate on her part.

So Aafia decides to do as shes told in exchange for her daughters life, the daughter is released to Pakistani govt. after Aafia gets caught in the act – everyone’s happy. Now US intelligence agencies can say ‘ hey we finally caught someone, n gave them a fair trial even, see’ and hope to improve their competence image/foreign relations. I’d like to know who’s heading their think tanks – my piss has more working brain cells, literally, pshh.

4. Neurology

Another possibility for prosecution/detention could be a forced demand for her neurological expertise. Its a long shot, but mind-related tech work and related abductions are not unheard of. FBI reports show that she had possible involvement in mind-control related tech (‘with Al Qaeda’) – so it can also be true the other way round – i.e. US looking for human resource in that area.

Why prosecute Aafia?

Why? because she is a symbol of Islam – a modern, educated, Islamic woman, one of the best at her trade, and a success story for all Muslim women in terms of her social status (pre-terrorism charges) – and by prosecuting her, you are indirectly prosecuting Islam, its culture, and its woman’s role in society. Aafia has been made an example, so that none can follow in her wake. Its not the terrorism that she didn’t commit, its her propagation of Islam and her commitment to right and wrong that hurt those in power.

Her prosecution is a public stunt to save face, and prevent the public form realizing the kind of racism being dished out at Muslims in the name of terrorism. If she is set free, it puts a black mark on the credibility of the FBI, the CIA, and all other state institutions that are so rampantly making a mockery of Justice in the US and the world over. It also nullifies the decade long campaign against maligning Islam and its followers. so, no fair trial pls – cant afford it.

As its far easier to blame an innocent person than to admit that the US system is messed up, opinionated, and severely biased against Muslims.

The objective is to send out a message – ‘Hey, This is an Islamic woman, a terrorist’. But that objective will not be achieved. Aafia is innocent, and the world will know it – the only propaganda this event will bring is further loss of credibility to those pulling the strings of US power . People in the US and the world over should condemn this act, speak against it. Muslims should support Islam, its propagation, and its culture as much as they can. Musims should shun terrorism and aggression being committed in the name of Islam. Because that is what Aafia’s life is all about – not terrorism. Not blowing up in peoples faces, not killing others and grabbing their land to ensure ones own safety. Not mercilessly killing, torturing  and detaining women and children as collateral for the sake of fictitious national security.

The objective of this decision, is to widen the east west rift further, and escalate it to full scale war.

What to do about this?

Don’t help achieve that objective. Don’t resort to violence. Develop might, but keep it defensive in nature. Improve internal security. Most importantly, stop selling out, at all levels. Go by right and wrong, not by ‘whats in it for me’.

The world and all its resources are subject to cultural influence, not modern warfare. Stop absorbing western culture blindly. Accept positive elements, reject negative ones. Remember who you are, live by it and die by it. Stand for the values that Aafia represents. Be more Islamic, and be proud of it. Excel at what you do. Realize that as Muslims, we need to watch out for ourselves. Protect each other n those around you. Don’t be a sell-out – stand up for what is right.

In the stream of events in this story – not one person in power, US or Pakistan alike, had the integrity to come forward and say ‘No – we will not be a part of this’. During our everyday lives, there are several situations , where we can take a stand, and we refuse to do so – that is where we are wrong. This is our country, our values and our nation and our women n children. We have to protect them.

Don’t hate non-Muslims – inspire them to Islam by being true Muslims, (not sold-out entertainment addicts) as Aafia has done all her life. Even in standing trial, she has laid bare the true nature of those in power in the US – their own people are turning against Islamic racism. Most importantly – get rid of your sell-out leadership ASAP, both in civil and military/intelligence ranks.

Do share with people, so that they know the real Aafia Siddiqui, esp. non Muslims. Comments and related material appreciated.

Sources: ‘compromizes’ US National Security – ‘Counter-terrorism at its best’

US military killing iraqi civiliansPeace everyone.

Just found a ‘US national security threat’ at, sharing it with you. The video below was taken in Iraq, 2007, and has been leaked from US military sources recently to wikileaks, a free journalism website that does not disclose its contributors (makes you wonder how the military found out about the leak source). US pentagon officials have claimed that publishing this video is a threat to US national security – while the act committed in this video is not.

Take a good look at it- and then read the inferences. They compare US propagandist perceptions (and those of the people pulling its strings) to factual representations of frequently abused terminologies. Once again- it is imperative to understand that what has been done in the video is NOT the will of the entire US masses- just a few people in power.

The US people need to rise to the occasion and REMOVE such elements from military/civilian authority that allow/cover and continue such rampant disrespect for human life globally.

The Video that ‘Compromises US National Security’

National Security

Actual - National security implies the level of safety prevalent within a region/nation as a result of its defense/internal regulation policies. it is a DEFENSIVE concept. Keeping moral values in focus – all actions taken under this veil by a nation should not, in any manner, undermine the security of fellow human states. Because if this is done – you end up creating a precedent to a threat to national security itself, much like the soldiers in this video have done. Killing innocents will always spark retaliation, and such retaliation is an act of defense, not terrorism, as it is a response to violence, and not an initiation of it.

US Propagandist- Wikipedia defines it as “the requirement to maintain the survival of the nation-state through the use of economic, military and political power and the exercise of diplomacy“. There is NO criteria for validity of any action taken in the name of national security. it is a ruse which can be used to justify anything you do, when you have no other alternative. A brigadier can bang his neighbors wife and his daughter simultaneously, n later call it a ‘matter of national security’ and get away with the action being labeled  as ‘patriotic’.

Ensuring national security over international relations

Actual – there are two norms for maintaining any kind of defense.

1. Strength and Endurance

Any entity looking to survive should be as economically stable as possible, and its reliance on third parties should be at a minimum. It should have the military might to fend off any attack, and make hyenas think twice about engaging it.

2. Reconciliation- confrontation only as a response

Once it has these 2 things – it should make sure that it uses them for reconciliation and not confrontation. Use of force as an initiation always results in a reaction, sometimes greater than your capacity to withstand it. Therefore, by the law of nature, use of force should only be in retaliation, and not initiation – that is the only way to ensure peace. Furthermore, it should be directed with precision at perpetrators, not innocents, as it only helps you create more enemies while burning billions of dollars in the process, as it has been done in this video.

The only way for the US to ensure national security is to start respecting international boundaries, religions and races, to stop invading other countries, and tightening its internal security policies. More than half the NS events that happen in the US turn out to be hoaxes created by third parties (including 9/11 – WMD in iraq, wars for oil etc) – which do not benefit the common US citizen (they actually take his life, both onshore and off-shore), but elite pockets in power. If the US spent half its military budget on researching alternate fuel technologies, it would progress far quicker economically, instead of incurring more n more debt over time.

US propagandist – “The only way to maintain true peace and security for the United states is to build ‘soft’ militaristic presence in foreign nations” (under veils and ruses of diplomacy, trade, terrorism and WMD). This is not my statement. For more info -look up this research paper 9651-Rebuilding-Americas-Defenses-PNACdated early this decade.

BTW- this DOESN’T work – the British already tried it in the last century, and they ended up losing their identity as a nation in the process (they are more than 50 ethnicities combined into a nation now, each with their own set of priorities) and most of their territory too.

Code of engagement (military)

Actual – When it comes to striking the enemy, great pains are taken to ensure that you strike the right areas, esp. if you are attacking first. Armies that cause the least amount of collateral damage find it easiest to win public popularity post-battle.  It also helps keep regional resources and infrastructure intact, saving a ton of rebuilding costs later(the US has been spending over Afghansitan infrastructure for over 10 years now, similarly for Iraq).

More time and effort is spent on collecting intel and recon data than on the actual strike. In a real battle – a mis-hit(undirected attack) is certain defeat. Due to the 1-100 military might ratio of most US opponents picked during the last 20 years, the US military has hardly been given any competition, and the only eyebrow rasiers are the big bills/casualties created. If they were going against even a remotely powerful nation – their misguided strikes would have lead to a quick victory – for the opponent – that is.

‘Don’t use cannon to kill mosquito’ (Chinese proverb)

US Propagandist – “We strike with full force, and win by all means necessary. We will not let bin laden, or any other terrorists evade us (despite the fact that we’ve been unable to get them over the past 15 years, we suck at intel, and we let his operatives evade us on home soil and airspace-9/11) and we will keep attacking possible locations of their refuge” (which has now officially gone to 3 different Muslim states, over 1,165,068 square kilometers-more than half orf North America).

The US military needs to start probing into their intelligence sources – it is evident that they are grossly misguided, or doing this on purpose, and have no intention of catching anyone whatsoever.

Terrorism and Counter-terrorism

Actual – Terrorism is any action that harms/threatens to harm the security of a fellow being – that is unwarranted (is not a response an equally violent action perpetrated prior to it). Counter-terrorism is the action taken against it – to prevent it from happening/happening again.

It is imperative to note that the recepient of any CT activity should be a proven terrorist, n not someone who ‘i think’ is one. Otherwise, 1 misdirected hit would make me a terrorist, as now, I am ‘initiating’ unwarranted harm on an innocent, and helping aggravate it to a chain reaction level.

Both are violent perpetration of harm against humans, but only 1 is justified. But do we teach our soldiers this? NO. we teach them to ‘follow orders’ and ‘kill mercilessly’ – BS.

US propagandist – Anything that’s red, white and blue is Counter-terrorism, even if it goes wrong. The rest, regardless of what happened before/after- is TERRORISM. Quite frankly, this approach is what is causing international security issues in the US.

Posting the video is not the national secturity threat – killing innocent people is.

Is that the last time it happened?

No. I have footage of Pakistan military and US drones attacking civilian areas in NWFP, Balochistan, which show children less than 1.5 years mutilated. Its pointless to share those, but it is a concern as more are dying everyday.
This video is a clear indication of how ‘educated’ most of these strikes are. Its just being done to create a body count n show ‘hey, we hit something’. Even our own military is doing such strikes, based on BS ‘intelligence reports’ on ‘Al Qaeda operatives’.

How to stop this

The only way to stop this is to go against the guy you have PROOF against, and finish the job. If you cant get it done right, bail out ASAP.  Strikes on Bin laden should be like the ones done on Benazir, Kennedy, Gandhi’s progeny and the like – ones that actually get through. Bombing half a nation doesn’t kill anyone but innocents.

We don’t need a military that cant do its job right, US and Pakistan alike. BS intelligence and proactive measures don’t account for scrap. Military should be accountable for loss of life just like civilians are. Every person in that chopper deserves a death sentence, esp. the ones who opened fire. it is plain 3rd degree mass genocide. There wasn’t any weapon on them, there was no AK47, there as no RPG. it was just 2 journalists with cameras, around 12 unarmed civilians and there were 2 innocent children in that van too. The only thing that WAS there was a trigger-happy US platoon playing Call of Duty 5 in Full HD, enjoying the effects of the gunfire as it murdered  innocent people below.

To stabilize  its national security, the US needs to be a responsible nation that respects human life. Once that is done, they should effectively strengthen their internal security, (HS) to a  level where they are able to maintain at least one term (4 years) of terror free, internal citizenship security. Once that is achieved, they need to start relocating their troops back to their own country, and focus more on deploying military man power- inter-state than off-shore.

Most of my best friends live in the US, and they hate whats happening as much as I do. The election of Obama was a result of him promising the people of a troop removal from Afghanistan and an end to domestic/international violence. Lets hope he delivers on it.

Most of the educated world looks to the leadership of the US to steer humanity into the right direction. Incompetence/lack of respect for human life at the helm will only lead to further international unrest and segregation. Unification requires a code of conduct that advocates justice, security, respect and equality, not regional interests.

Comments appreciated. Share as much as you can.



The waters Black in Pakistan – Part II

Salaam Guys,Xe logo

I recently found a video detailing blackwater residential/military locations all over Pakistan. I would suggest everyone look at this video, and propagate it as far and wide as you can. I’m in the process of trying to get in touch with former CE/President Musharraf’s representatives to get his official statement in this regard, as these operations backtrack to his tenure (2007). let us hope that he will shed some light on the nature of this organizations activities.